I should begin by saying that I am both a vegan and a Christian. There are compelling reasons to be both. Several Christian publications offer valid reasons for the Christian to consider the vegetarian lifestyle. These include the fact that God’s original intent was for human beings to be vegetarians (Gen 1:29) and Isaiah’s inspiring prophecy in which the lion will someday eat straw like the ox (Is 65:25). So it seems that, according to the Christian worldview, the order that has proceeded, and that which will proceed, this current state, will be peaceful and bloodless. Not much to argue with so far. But many Christian vegetarians are appalled by Luke 24: 42 & 43, “They gave him a piece of broiled fish, and he took it and ate it in their presence.”
What can this mean? Some insist that this passage is a forgery, it can not be authentic. Others claim that this single verse makes vegetarianism completely incompatible with Christianity. But lets take a closer look.
If we take this verse to be an authentic account of Jesus Christ after the resurrection, and we uphold the belief that he was without sin, then we must deduct that eating meat is not inherently sinful. This point may seem like anathema to any vegan, Christian or otherwise. But once we analyze the politics of food, it becomes clear that the option to avoid meat is sometimes available only to a privileged few. For example, the impoverished and starving child hardly has the option to refuse any meal that is provided. The natives of extreme elevations or frozen tundras haven’t had the luxury of choosing a vegetarian diet (until recently, but which still remains highly unsustainable). And as any honest vegan will tell you, even we are not without blood on our hands. The vegan philosophy is not about the impossible task of eliminating any and all animal suffering in our lives, it is about minimizing it. Animals suffer and die in the process of farming and shipping vegetables. Animals suffer and die in the process of mining the metals, and harvesting the lumber, that is used to make the household objects that people use everyday. Hell, even people suffer and die in the process of securing the petroleum that is used to make the plastic used to build the computer you are looking at right now. There is no one who has lived without causing harm to another living creature, whether directly or indirectly. No one. Not even Christ.
So, in that simple act of eating a piece of broiled fish, Christ has placed himself in solidarity with the poor of world. He has removed the guilt from those who are without the luxury of being vegetarians. But my argument here is not that people should choose to eat meat. It is precisely the opposite. If offered the choice, people should choose to minimize animal death and suffering to the best of their ability. That choice, however, should not make them feel superior to any other human being. As in the words of the Apostle Paul, “For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them” (Eph 2:8-10).
February 26th, 2013 at 12:32 pm
wow, that is really deep, where do you find the time for all your researching? Could you find me a picture of the Gleaners? Love You Mom!
September 8th, 2014 at 12:29 pm
Its a good summation. I guess we will really never know. There has been mistranslations in the bible of fishweed being eaten but was translated as fish. Even the name Jehovah is a mistranslation of Yahweh. We call Yeshua, the true name of Jesus incorrectly. We misinterpret a lot in the bible. It is sorting out the misconceptions instead of just accepting everything at face value. I want to take the bible for every word but I can’t. It takes time, and work to get to know the true Yeshua and see what truly resonates with you.
I question the word broiled. Out of the whole bible, why was the word ‘broiled’ used?. I figure someone wanted people to believe Yeshua ate fish because originally, the word fishweed was accepted in those times. Was the person who wrote the Gospel of Luke there who wrote the Gospel of Luke?
A resounding No.
The Gospel of Luke was written well after the resurrection, around 70 years after. There is no ‘original’ copy of the Gospel of Luke. Why was this detail added? A detail, such as Jesus eating broiled fish, and with the notation also of it being done in front of people is hard for me to swallow.
People who followed Yeshua didn’t want to give up flesh so a little tweaking was in order. Little did they realize how this tweaking would change the course of animals welfare, care, dignity with disdain.
January 12th, 2015 at 1:26 pm
[…] https://howlingwaste.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/why-jesus-ate-fish-an-open-letter-to-vegetarian-christ… […]
January 12th, 2015 at 2:33 pm
[…] https://howlingwaste.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/why-jesus-ate-fish-an-open-letter-to-vegetarian-christ… […]